Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 1241 - 1260 of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2011, 1:49 pm by Susan Brenner
After being charged with conspiring to import 500 grams or more of cocaine into the United States in violation of 21 U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 2:32 pm
Shirts come in three sizesThe roll of the troll in shaping US patent legislation, and the dividing line between true and the faux troll, are matters that can provide endless hours of argument both in the United States and beyond. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 1:11 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
Guy (John Hopkins UP, 2007, 348 p.) is a classic for those doing historical research on GIs. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:00 am by Ryan Scoville
” As readers know, it’s difficult for the executive to prevail in traditional Category 3 cases, but Zivotofsky v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 10:40 pm by Shamnad Basheer
”ProtectionismWhat she forgot to mention is that the United States routinely issues such licences, albeit through their courts which refuse to grant patent injunctions on grounds of public interest. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:30 am by Dan Eller
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division, touched on this issue in a decision last week.In Morris v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 1:51 pm by Steve Sady
§ 3553(a) and United States v Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), a further reduction generally would not be appropriate. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:34 pm by Steve Hall
It also has inspired discussion about why the United States' death chambers have shown such an extreme gender imbalance. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:17 am by IntLawGrrls
The first one is quite a classic one; it was the case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]