Search for: "California v. United States"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 12,634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2012, 6:44 am
In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 7:14 am
Section 230, as a federal law, also preempts the California state constitution. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm
Partnership v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 am
Shubb of the Eastern District of California issued an opinion denying certification in Quezada v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
HamiltonCase number: 12-cv-0445 (United States District Court for the Southern District of California)Case filed: February 21, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: March 28, 2013 4/15/2013 7/15/2013 2013-34 SEC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 5:49 am
Navasca, United Stated District Court for the Northern District of California, No. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 8:42 am
Solicitor General Robert Bork in the Second Circuit to overturn racketeering and fraud convictions in United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:04 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has unveiled an Ombudsperson Program for attorneys to raise issues about the Court or individual judges. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:25 am
The California Supreme Court, you see, doesn’t read the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
On April 12, 2024, the United States Supreme Court unanimously decided Sheetz v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:26 pm
For many years PTI imported Singha Beer into the United States under an agreement with BRTI. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 3:33 pm
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of California recently held that an insurer breached its duty to defend where the undisputed facts demonstrated that there was a "potential" for coverage under the policy. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 12:39 pm
Which is perhaps not surprising given what the California Supreme Court has said on this issue, which (as today's opinion explains) is this:"Citing Graham v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:18 am
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision denying the motion to compel, and Viking River petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 7:18 am
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s decision denying the motion to compel, and Viking River petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
Citing Barrett v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:13 pm
In a recent interview with California Lawyer magazine, United States Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia made what has become a somewhat controversial statement about gender discrimination and the United States Constitution:You do not need the Constitution to reflect the wishes of the current society. [read post]
