Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 7:32 am by Steve Hall
That year, he famously wrote in dissent in Callins v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
As Graber notes, my political account ends with the resignation of Richard Nixon, and a lot has gone on since then. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am by Peter Shane
Nixon in determining the enforceability of the subpoena. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:13 am by Jack Goldsmith
Olson, 487 U.S. 654, 695 (1988) for the proposition the transfer restrictions would have “prevent[ed] the Executive Branch from accomplishing its constitutionally assigned functions,” and on Nixon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm by cdw
State, 959 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2007), and Nixon v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But, of course, Richard Nixon named four justices in his truncated years in office and Donald Trump three. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm by Betsy McKenzie
., a Nixon appointee who voted with the court’s conservatives on criminal justice issues but was a strong supporter of abortion rights, and Potter Stewart, the last of President Dwight D. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Suppose President Obama wins all of the electoral votes from (1) all of the Northeastern states except New Hampshire; (2) Maryland, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Virginia; (3) all of the states that border on the Pacific Ocean except Alaska; and (4) New Mexico, Colorado, Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
In other words, Nixon was trying to subvert the established procedures of the Justice Department. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by John Dean
I first heard talk of changing Rule XXII, which required 67 votes to invoke cloture to end a filibuster, to require only 60 votes instead, while I was working at the Nixon White House, but this rule change was not finally accomplished until 1975 after Nixon had departed. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am by Adam Klasfeld
” However, Cannon appeared troubled by the “limitless” nature of the appropriations, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. [read post]
26 Aug 2017, 4:43 pm by Bernie Burk
My Lounge colleague Steve Lubet recently discussed in this space the op-eds published elsewhere by Martin Redish and Noah Feldman concerning President Trump’s pardon of former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. [read post]