Search for: "People v Justice A."
Results 1261 - 1280
of 22,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2013, 1:28 pm
A week ago today, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a Texas case called Salinas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 12:07 pm
At Wednesday’s oral argument in Culbertson v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:03 am
” On Wednesday, the Supreme Court examined this clause during oral argument in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:26 am
V. v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am
In Dawson v Steager, 586 U. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 9:10 am
Officers in a helicopter tracked the Sebring using a powerful magnifying camera, which enabled them to see people on the ground from an altitude of 6,500 to 8,000 feet. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 3:00 pm
Justice Grimes relies on an "exigent circumstances" case that said that it was okay for a police officer to hop over a fence when he saw a gun lying on the ground and says it's the same thing here: gun, barking and/or whining dogs, no difference. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:55 am
Supreme Court, in Powell v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am
These people know how to live. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Still no Brown v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 2:46 pm
In Altmann, the plaintiffs stress, the justices rejected the idea that the general presumption against laws applying retroactively, outlined in Landgraf v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:12 pm
Since Bush v. [read post]
4 May 2017, 11:09 am
But Alito then weighs in on the "culture wars," criticizing the Court's handling of Fisher v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 5:24 am
” Justice Burns likened the present case to French v Fraser, in which Justice Lucy McCallum referred to the plaintiff as “the target of a senseless vendetta founded in madness”. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 7:08 pm
Yet, in KSR v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:38 am
New Article: Colleen V. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:49 am
That “switch in time” paved the way for overruling Roe v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:41 am
The memos in this case were written in the wake of the Supreme Court's landmark decision in U.S. v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 9:41 am
Meanwhile, conservative senators and legal experts and some centrists have criticized it as a thinly veiled rationale for seeking justices who will bend the law to benefit favored classes of people. [read post]
