Search for: "People v Legall" Results 1261 - 1280 of 31,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Stanley Waleski sued the law firm of Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP in Pennsylvania state court for legal malpractice relating to its representation of him in a bankruptcy matter. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 7:05 am by Neal Fortin
Kell from the Department of Justice (December 21, 2006) in Biovail Corporation. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 8:54 am by LTA-Editor
The implications of the recent debate over 23andMe is even more important after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by David Super
“We have the opportunity as a result of that to have a supermajority, even though...we may not even be in an absolute majority when it comes to the people who agree with us. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 6:01 am by Rosalind English
Jude and others (Respondents) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotand) [2011] UKSC 55 – read judgment;  McGowan (Procurator Fiscal, Edinburgh) (Appellant) v B (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 54 – read judgment In these two cases the Supreme Court has considered whether  the failure to take up on  legal representation during police interview amounted to a waiver of the right of access to legal advice for the purposes of… [read post]
8 May 2023, 5:30 am by Joy
Here are our leading legal headlines for the week of May 8, 2023 from Wise Law on Twitter:Google liable for $500,000 in damages for not delisting defamatory information: A.B. v GoogleNon-U.S. residents banned from purchasing tickets to Maple Leafs road games in FloridaWitness calls discrimination at the human rights commission a national scandalTransgender Lawmaker Sues Over Removal From Montana House FloorAustralia to ban recreational vaping in e-cigarette crackdownCanada… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 10:09 am by Dennis McKinnie
There’s a quiet debate among legal pundits that’s often played out on social media sites such as Twitter, one that probably not too many people pay attention to. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am by Catherine Fisk
  Unions strenuously oppose them because they believe it violates their own First Amendment rights to be legally compelled to provide free legal services to people who choose not to join. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
Plotkin did not agree, citing the legal principle that governments cannot ban anonymous political campaigning. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
The legal communication / legal rhetoric papers being presented at the conference include the following (if you know of other legal communication papers being presented at the conference, please feel free to list them in the comments): Jennifer Andrus, University of Utah, and Nathan Atkinson, Georgia State University: Photographs, Witnesses and Bodies: Toward a Visual Rhetoric of Law Joseph Bartolotta, University of Minnesota: Indulging John Marshall’s… [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
The legal communication / legal rhetoric papers being presented at the conference include the following (if you know of other legal communication papers being presented at the conference, please feel free to list them in the comments): Jennifer Andrus, University of Utah, and Nathan Atkinson, Georgia State University: Photographs, Witnesses and Bodies: Toward a Visual Rhetoric of Law Joseph Bartolotta, University of Minnesota: Indulging John Marshall’s… [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People as was established in People v. [read post]