Search for: "State v. Vanness" Results 1261 - 1280 of 3,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2018, 7:35 am by Mark Tabakman
 The Court stated that “taking a Strom van to work was at least two steps removed from their steel production duties. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:35 am by Juan C. Antúnez
By the way, this presumption was reflected (if not explicitly stated) by the 1st DCA in Cody v. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm by NL
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 2:56 pm by NL
On quantum for general damages, Ms Herelle had argued for assessment on the basis of a nominal reduction in rent, assessed as a percentage, following Niazi Services Ltd v Van der Loo [2004] EWCA Civ 53, and English Churches v Shine [2004] EWCA Civ 434, or, if the Court disagreed, then on the basis of the Wallace v Manchester 30 HLR 1111 'unofficial tariff'. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:27 am by Gilles Cuniberti
In first instance, Aikens J. referred to the leading commentary of Van den Berg on the New York Convention which states that conflict of laws rules of the Convention ”are to be treated as uniform”. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
Raulin v Minister van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen Case C-357/89 states that duration of work is a finding of fact, but also supports taking the previous wok history into account. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:15 am by Sean Minahan
  The court’s entire decision can be found at Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:44 am by Jon Lewis
On May 29, two contracted Federal Protective Service officers were shot outside the Ronald V. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This Sunday profile of Judge Lackey in the Sun-Herald notes that he's "a deacon at First Baptist Church and a member of a state commission charged with ensuring judicial integrity," which as several commentators note might indicate that he was a risky one to approach with a proposal for corruption. [read post]
  The judge acknowledged that the parties might have their own goals when it comes to scheduling but stated that parties to such patent cases should regard themselves “as under a duty to inform the Court about of scheduling issues”. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Here's the North Carolina Court of Appeals court's analysis, from State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]