Search for: "United States v. Gross"
Results 1261 - 1280
of 1,808
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
United States, 440 U.S. 48, 55 (1979). [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:01 am
’ not descriptive as a matter of law: Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 2:48 am
Walton, Judge, The United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaClosing remarks4:15-4:30 p.m. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Bar and the State Bar of New York. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
The court's statement in Religious Technology Center v Lerma (1995) was also cited in argument of the danger of granting prior restraints in copyright cases such as this as being unconstitutional:"If a threat to national security was insufficient to warrant a prior restraint in New York Times Co. v United States, the threat to plaintiff's copyrights and trade secrets is woefully inadequate. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 8:34 am
” “The reach of the CCPA cannot be underestimated — businesses outside of California are not necessarily outside the scope of the CCPA… Given the scope and reach of the CCPA, it comes as no surprise that most companies in the United States that do business with California residents and meet any of the qualification criteria are scrambling to comply. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 7:53 am
Linc-Drop, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:52 am
By 1920, nearly every state had enacted workers’ comp laws. [read post]
25 May 2020, 5:17 pm
Three shareholders co-own an 8-year old internet-based “marketeer” business that imports Chinese-manufactured sinks, faucets, and related plumbing fixtures that it sells primarily to distributors and retailers in the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
United States v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 5:40 am
See Bullard v. [read post]
UK Information Commissioner’s Office released a New Draft Employment Guidance for Monitoring at Work
28 Nov 2022, 1:01 am
Both guidelines state that it is good practice to conduct a DPIA in most cases, as it allows employers to determine if and how to carry out monitoring in a way that minimizes the risks of any monitoring activity. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:01 am
In Quill Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, a company that licensed films challenged the collection of state taxes on the gross receipts of royalties from its licenses.8 The company argued that its copyrights were “instrumentalities” of the federal government and, thus, immune from state taxation. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 3:09 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
’” Quoting United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 1:16 pm
Entities (i) with greater than 20 employees, (ii) that file Federal income tax returns demonstrating gross receipts or sales exceeding $5,000,000, and (iii) having a physical office in the United States are also exempt from the Proposed Rule. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 5:06 pm
United States, a case that was originally argued last fall. [read post]
