Search for: "United States v. Moore" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am by INFORRM
Moore-Bick LJ said “Finally, it is necessary to mention briefly the recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of MGN v The United Kingdom (Application No. 39401/04), in which the court held that the award of costs in favour of Miss Campbell against MGN that included a success fee (upheld in Campbell v MGN (No. 2)) involved an infringement of the defendant’s right to free speech. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:56 pm
(Michael Geist) Canadian Heritage Minister James Moore: The iPadLock Minister? [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm by Eugene Volokh
Moore, Bob Cameron, and the City of Kokomo ("Defendants") violated his right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Indian caste system—to which Isabel Wilkerson has compared the race-based caste system in the United States—is present in the novel (in references to Brahmins and Untouchables), but the hierarchy and social distance between the Anglo-Indians and Indians is at the core of the novel. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 8:15 pm
The United States appeals Joseph Hairston's 60- month sentence, which was re-imposed by the district court on remand in light of United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Va. 1954), observed that "we have found no authority in the United States which holds that mere defamation can be enjoined," and therefore reversed an anti-libel injunction. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 8:13 am by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am by Robert Cook-Deegan
  It is clear that the patent rights in this case have affected who can get tested, how testing is conducted in the United States, and who owns and controls the information that results from genetic tests. [read post]