Search for: "United States v. Moore" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Kate Huddleston
HB4 is extreme anti-immigrant state legislation, and an extraordinary state arrogation of the exclusively federal power to regulate entry to and exit from the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 12:12 pm by Stephanie Zable
The law permits a president to “deal with any unusual and extraordinary threat, which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States, to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States,” if he first declares a national emergency under the National Emergencies Act (NEA). [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 5:58 am
Eversole appeals his sentence raising several technical challenges to the manner of calculating his offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
 The  United States Supreme Court has started every session since February 1, 1790  with "Oyez Oyez..........God save the United States and this honorable Court". [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
United States Docket: 09-342 Issues: (1) What constitutes the proper denominator in the takings fraction under Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:02 am by Abbe R. Gluck
” In this regard, it is interesting to note that the leading precedent the government relies on is United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While the former course is undoubtedly preferable, past events in the United States and beyond make it crystal clear that both are possible. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am by INFORRM
The bill would introduce new powers to deal with serious disruption caused by protesters, including allowing the Secretary of State to bring civil proceedings against campaigners. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:35 pm by William Ryan Moore
In April of 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided a case that involved racial discrimination under 42 USC 1981 claims based on race. [read post]