Search for: "United States v. Sharpe" Results 1261 - 1280 of 1,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm by Benjamin Bissell
” The report goes on to state that both the United States and Israel have been accused of sabotaging key aspects of the Iranian military in the past in the hopes of derailing Iran’s controversial nuclear program. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Articles cited herein without stated authors are those of the author of this article—Ken Chasse.) [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:14 pm
See, e.g., “Unpacking the Court: The Case for the Expansion of the United States Supreme Court in the Twenty-First Century. [read post]
27 May 2008, 2:26 pm
Collectively, they make a compelling case for change.In Shaw v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In both the United States and Canada, they found people would forgo money in order to avoid hearing about the political thinking of those they disagree with. [read post]
16 May 2015, 4:44 pm by The Book Review Editor
In Living Weapons: Biological Warfare and International Security, he argues that, in sharp contrast to nuclear weapons seen from a strategic perspective, biological weapons have features that complicate international security strategy. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm by Jasmine Harris
Some state laws, however, allow plaintiffs to recover damages for enforcing the state equivalent of Title III provisions. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
On 1 March 2016, Sharp and Hamblen LJJ heard a renewed application for permission to appeal in the case of Sloutsker v Romanova. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Forbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), (Patent Prospector),Rambus – Rambus stock soars following jury’s dismissal of antitrust and fraud charges from Hynix, Micron, and Nanya that… [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:21 am by The Book Review Editor
Human rights by the 1970s (on what must be accounted a revisionist view to the dominant narrative) represents a retreat to an individualistic ethic of rights against states. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
A unanimous Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent established in Betts v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm by Christopher Fonzone
When stakes are high, as they invariably are in the national security context, there’s always going to be sharp elbows and bureaucratic tensions. [read post]