Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 19,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
Last week, a church in Washington state filed suit in federal district court challenging the constitutionality of Washington Senate Bill 6219 signed into law last March which requires all health care plans in the state to cover contraceptives and sterilization, and to cover abortion to the same extent as they cover maternity care. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:22 am
Fishbaugh DA 19-0149 2021 MT 78N Criminal – Sexual Intercourse without Consent City of Billings v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
On September 8, 2011, members of the United States Congress passed the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (H.R. 1249) with a vote of 88-9, without amendment to the House bill passed in late June. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 12:47 pm
Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
Even setting aside Bush v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 9:15 am
When the Court denied certiorari in American Axle v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 9:15 am
When the Court denied certiorari in American Axle v. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 1:09 pm
Lord v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 9:37 am
InRomer v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:48 am
The court has also stated that the very purpose of the formal requirements imposed by Article 17 (now Article 25 of Brussels Ia) is to ensure that consensus between the parties is in fact established (Case 313/85 Iveco Fiat v Van Hool EU:C:1986:423, [5]). [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am
” (Cite to Dart v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 11:00 pm
” 332 years later The four defendants attempted to shut down prosecutions against them by relying on Article 9 of the 1688 Bill of Rights, which states: That the Freedome of Speech and Debates or Proceedings in Parlyament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any Court or Place out of Parlyament. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 9:09 am
(Jurisdiction)State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 5:28 am
Interestingly, clause 5(2) is specifically stated to be without prejudice to cl. 5(1). [read post]
FOSTA Case Update: Court Dismisses Lawsuit Without Ruling on Whether the Statute is Unconstitutional
25 Sep 2018, 1:28 pm
United States:https://www.eff.org/document/woodhull-freedom-foundation-et-al-v-united-states-complaint Related Cases: Woodhull Freedom Foundation et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
United States Department of Transportation (Public Transportation Project - Sacred Places)Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Steven Archavage v Professional Account Services, 2017 WL 1162911 (M.D. [read post]
10 May 2017, 2:18 pm
Shindler v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:33 pm
In Lewis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:56 pm
" In 2008, "the Supreme Court agreed with the pre-emption policy in a case [Riegel v. [read post]
