Search for: "Brown v Doe" Results 1281 - 1300 of 5,965
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2020, 12:02 pm by NCC Staff
Mazars Is a Victory for Rule of Law By Quinta Jurecic, Managing Editor, Lawfare Quinta Jurecic writes that the Supreme Court’s decision in Mazars v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am by Stephen Griffin
  In the process the article raises questions about how we should understand the scope of the achievement of those who sponsored and ratified the Reconstruction amendments.In the last part of “Optimistic Originalism” I discuss why Brown is commonly viewed as a “living constitutionalist” opinion (Here and elsewhere in these posts I put living constitutionalism in scare quotes because I think the real issue is how to understand the process of constitutional change… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am by Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Sophia Gaulkin
Supreme Court’s 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am by Jeanne Huang
The Facebook judgment does not specify what evidence should be provided by the plaintiff in order to prove that it is not sensible or realistic to effect [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:12 am
Here are the actual results:The first case is U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:21 am by Florence Campbell Jones
The recent case of Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13 clarified the English law position that a principal cannot be vicariously liable for the acts of an independent contractor. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 8:35 am by Stephen Pitel
The Supreme Court of Canada has held in Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:14 pm by Steve Gottlieb
The Court now does its best to restore the worst abuses of that century of intimidation and impunity. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Charles BarzunIn the last Part of this series, I suggested that the essential nugget at the heart of “living constitutionalism” is the idea that part of what grounds the constitution’s authority for us is its capacity to adapt (i.e., to respond appropriately) to changing circumstances. [read post]