Search for: "IN RE CERTIFICATION OF QUESTION OF STATE LAW"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 2,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2010, 10:19 am
You know you’re $50 short but figure, “Oh well. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
To date, 83 cities have received the What Works Cities Certification. [read post]
22 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
To date, 83 cities have received the What Works Cities Certification. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 6:31 pm
Mason CJ and Deane J stated at [25] – [29] as to the status of the Convention in Australian law: “25. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am
It focuses on the procedure and rules of evidence for the trial of a New York matrimonial action or custody case, and contains questions for the examination and cross-examination of witnesses.Recent LegislationLaws of 2019, Ch 523, enacted and effective November 20, 2019, amended Family Court Act § 412(2)(d), Domestic Relations Law § 236[B](5-a) (b)(5) and Domestic Relations Law § 236[B](6)(b)(4) Laws of 2019, Ch 523, enacted and effective… [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:45 am
What would you do to build upon, change, or weaken these laws? [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Archives can be found here and on The Environmental Law and Climate Change Law Blog. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
In this post, I’ll address four things: (i) The unusual and, in some respects, questionable strategies of Trump’s counsel, Jonathan Mitchell at the oral argument; (ii) the Chief Justice’s question about why Congress repealed its 1870-enacted enforcement mechanisms in the Twentieth Century; (iii) Justice Gorsuch’s questions about the source of a state’s power to exclude insurrectionists from a ballot in… [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 12:50 pm
The court stated that litigants are entitled to discover whether an expert's opinions are his own or a mere parroting of what he or she was told by counsel.It is noted that there is currently a petition for re-argument en banc filed by the plaintiff pending before the Superior Court in this matter. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
The question is currently before the Supreme Court in Nijhawan v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
See In re Panacryl Sutures Prods. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am
We’re either not smart enough, not creative enough, not something enough. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:10 pm
They had some family law questions because of who has parental rights. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:09 pm
Well, usually they don’t have to: the law in most states requires the judge to instruct the jury that the machines are presumed to be accurate! [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 7:12 am
If you’re not sure how to answer one or more questions on Form 4473, talk with a Columbus weapons crimes lawyer from Luftman, Heck & Associates. [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
15 May 2007, 4:48 am
., that it violated FISA and that the Article II argument OLC had previously approved was not an adequate justification (a conclusion prompted by the New AAG, Jack Goldsmith, having undertaken a systematic review of OLC's previous legal opinions regarding the Commander in Chief's powers); (ii) that the White House nevertheless continued with the program anyway, despite DOJ's judgment that it was unlawful; (iii) that Comey, Ashcroft, the head of the FBI (Robert Mueller) and several… [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:39 am
” The respondents argued that they met the second part of this test because the two who had been charged with unlawfully entering the United States had violated the law again by re-entering unlawfully, something the crime’s high recidivism rate suggested was reasonably likely to occur. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:12 am
Cal.Implications for sanctions motion in United States et al. v. [read post]
