Search for: "In re Means" Results 1281 - 1300 of 89,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 11:30 pm
The Trail Blazers were pummeled in Phoenix this evening, which means that they're tied with the Suns at 1 game apiece, with the two teams heading to Portland for Game 3 Thursday night. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 8:27 am by Tom Smith
“This ruling will fundamentally re-order the gig economy and bring an end to rife exploitation of workers by means of algorithmic and contract trickery,” Farrar said by email. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 11:20 am
I've been meaning to write this case since it came out, because it's so interesting: In re Curry, 880 N.E.2d 388 (Mass. 2008). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 10:44 am by Tom Smith
Does this mean President Obama is wrong to describe companies engaging in inversion as “corporate deserters”? [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:54 am
That seems to be what happened in In re Ruiz, a case from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:00 am by Joseph Allen
We need to get ahead of the curve and aggressively publicize what we’re doing to protect the public interest. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 2:59 pm
James Dobson of Focus on the Family issued a statement lauding the Palins and asserting, "Being a Christian does not mean you're perfect. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:45 am
But as the sun rouses them, they're moved to preen:They get moving, onto the real grass, where breakfast awaits:They cross the yard lines that mean nothing to them... or perhaps the lines do mean something to them. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:18 pm by Glenn Reynolds
I’m not sure, though, that “knocked boots” means what the NYT copy desk seems to think it means . . . . [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:13 am
“Apparently they’re talking about cutting funding for juniors in big criminal prosecutions. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 7:05 am by Walter Olson
The new California law on consumer data is stringent but, as is so often the case with that state’s legislation, less than pellucidly clear [Natasha Singer, New York Times] : “Companies have different interpretations, and depending on which lawyer they are using, they’re going to get different advice,” said Kabir Barday, the chief executive of OneTrust, a privacy management software service that has worked with more than 4,000 companies to prepare for the law. [read post]