Search for: "Jack Goldsmith"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2018, 11:17 am
Matthew Kahn posted the Lawfare Podcast, in which Jack Goldsmith interviews Niall Ferguson about Ferguson’s new book, “The Square and the Tower: Networks, Hierarchies and the Struggle for Power. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Protect Democracy also represents Lawfare contributors and editors Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, Scott Anderson and Susan Hennessey on a number of separate matters.) [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Goldsmith SS 598/2 22 5/18/23 21-1496 Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:48 pm
Jack Goldsmith and Benjamin Wittes provided a helpful guide for those perplexed by the ongoing flap over FBI Director James Comey and the Clinton email investigation. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 1:57 pm
Bob Bauer and Jack Goldsmith analyzed two House bills to regulate abuse of the presidential pardon power. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 9:55 am
Finally, Howell shared a second episode of The Lawfare Podcast this week featuring a discussion with Jack Goldsmith on his new book "In Hoffa’s Shadow. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 12:52 pm
Kahn posted the Lawfare Podcast, a conversation between Jack Goldsmith and Phil Carter on civil-military relations. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:33 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith and Benjamin Wittes examined in detail the danger to presented by Trump to the “Grand Bargain” between the intelligence community and the American people. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway explained how the limited and informal system in place at the time of Snepp v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 9:18 am
It’s not just a check the box consideration, a pro forma nod to a co-equal political branch; as Jack Goldsmith pointed out in The Terror Presidency, it is a good idea all on its own for plans hatched in a hermetically sealed executive branch environment to be presented to a group of legislators if only so that there is a broad based review on grounds of basic common sense. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 8:41 am
This of course is part of a general meme pursued by people like me, Ben Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, Bobby Chesney, and oth [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Take Ben’s bold assertion in his testimony before the House Armed Services Committee last week: “many—though not all—of the legitimate criticisms that people of diverse politics are making against the administration’s draft do not apply, or apply with significantly lesser force, to a draft AUMF that Jack Goldsmith, Matthew Waxman, my co-panelist Robert Chesney, and I put forth last year. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 6:55 am
On Sunday, Matt Danzer tipped us off that the Department of Justice declassified two Office of Legal Counsel opinions by Jack Goldsmith from 2004. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 10:42 am
” (Goldsmith, “Against Cyberanarchy,” 65 U. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 11:46 am
Writing last week in Slate magazine, Jack Goldsmith and Dahlia Lithwick rightly note that if the president is entitled to set the law-enforcement agenda, no one can complain if the politically appointed head of the DOJ takes steps to advance those priorities. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
To some extent, that argument is weakened by the existence of conservative lawyers like Jack Goldsmith, who stood up to a great deal of pressure to defend the ideal of the rule of law. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:56 am
Bradley & Jack J. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 5:18 pm
UPDATE: Jack Goldsmith responds to my post by arguing that it “is not right to claim that those who support the President’s authority to make such decisions free from judicial review do not believe in legal constraints on the presidency. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:34 pm
Harvard law professor Jack Goldsmith argues that the proposal doesn’t impose any meaningful limitations on the president, because it doesn’t take back the administration’s previous claims that it can wage war against ISIS based on the 2001 AUMF against the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks and the president’s inherent authority. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 10:11 pm
(He finally relented to some extent, reportedly, when they all threatened to resign, and eventually approved a somewhat modified program approved by Jack Goldsmith on a narrower legal theory. [read post]
