Search for: "King v. People" Results 1281 - 1300 of 2,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fairness to deceased’s estates about benefiting from use v. other people w/no connection.Amy Maggs: Central staff/drafter. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
  And so, even as a great many peoples worship the idea of the formless, they cannot help but provide manifestations of that formlessness as a bridge (and then ultimately as the thing itself). [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
Michael Varey v People: The complaint was of harassment by a photographer commissioned via an agency. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:51 am
However, if he is convicted, prosecutors plan ...See all stories on this topic   PEOPLE v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
At trial plaintiff requested treble damages pursuant to Judiciary Law §487 claiming that defendant deceived this court and committed perjury in claiming to have filed a CPL 440 motion and thus forcing the court (Diamond, J.) to order the Kings County Supreme Court file (People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:58 pm by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Texas jury finds against Google in Linux patent case, determines damage award of $5,000,000: Bedrock Computer Technologies v Google et al (FOSS Patents) (IP Watch) (TechnoLlama) (IPBiz) Apple files suit against Samsung over alleged copying of ‘look and feel’ of iPhone and iPad – Apple Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
  Some coverage and commentary anticipate the Court’s decision in King v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
 Under the misappropriation theory endorsed by the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:42 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Privacy protections can help people hide identity of registration. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:02 pm by Brian M. Wright
In King County, current data shows that 16.8% of positive cases require hospitalization. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Second, the claims are ineligible for patent protection under the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Alice v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:46 am
Posted by Sherry Colb  In my FindLaw column this week, I discuss the case of Graham v. [read post]