Search for: "Means v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 61,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2011, 2:14 am
Oguz v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Centre for Advice on Individual Rights in Europe intervening) C-186/10; [2011] WLR (D) 259 “Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 at Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 (OJ 1973 C 113 p17), had to be interpreted as meaning that it could be relied on by a Turkish national who, having… [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:39 am
In its recent decision in State of Texas v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 10:16 am
Circuit in Halbig v. [read post]
1 May 2025, 1:06 pm
The case, Briskin v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 5:30 am
In Castellanos v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm
What this means is that states will be able to continue (or expand) their efforts to require the collection of sales/use tax by online vendors. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Sanchez v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
If a lawsuit is filed in the wrong venue, the court will likely dismiss the case without prejudice, meaning you can file again. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:02 am
If a lawsuit is filed in the wrong venue, the court will likely dismiss the case without prejudice, meaning you can file again. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 12:14 pm
If such provisions concern matters otherwise beyond Congress' legislative powers, the Constitution leaves their implementation to the States. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
As the 8th District’s decision a couple weeks ago in State v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 7:00 am
The statute requires states to justify any substantial burden on the religious exercise of inmates in federally funded correctional facilities as furthering a compelling interest by the least restrictive means possible. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 3:20 pm
Yesterday, Gibbons v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:59 am
In LLOG Exploration Offshore, LLC v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 8:45 am
(State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 8:00 am
There is no private right of action under the Air Carrier Access Act, and the complaint also fails to state a claim under the ADA.The case is Lopez v. [read post]
