Search for: "Michael Dorf" Results 1281 - 1300 of 1,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The President has thus far refused to follow the constitutionally required path, which is (as my Justia colleague Professor Michael Dorf and I have been arguing for quite some time now) to borrow the amount of money needed to meet the country’s legal obligations. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
In a recent column, Professors Sherry Colb and Michael Dorf wrote about a sub-controversy that arose from the first episode of the “Roseanne” reboot, in which Conner dismisses two shows built around nonwhite families with a snarky and cutting remark. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf maintains that “Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion inadequately responds to the key objection by Chief Justice Roberts” in dissent that a change in states’ ability to tax out-of-state retailers should come from Congress. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Michael Dorf and Andrew Koppelman and me in our amicus brief in the case, and see Prof. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
One answer, as Michael Dorf and I discuss in our book, Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights, is that once a pregnant woman decides, for whatever reason, that she no longer wants to be carrying a pregnancy to term, she has a powerful interest in freeing herself from the physiological burdens of pregnancy. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
As Michael Dorf notes in this post, there are cases in which the maker of a brand-name pharmaceutical challenged the approval of a generic, but this avenue will not always be available. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 8:40 pm by Guest Author
But, as Professor Dorf observed, that avenue may be blocked in civil suits, because of the possibility of summary judgment. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 9:36 am
Dorf. who runs a blog or something) raised some important questions that I will address below. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
As Michael Dorf described here, one can identify important distinctions between the two “liberties”—refusing to vaccinate and abortion—so that a libertarian position on one issue does not necessarily entail a libertarian position on the other.In this column, I will discuss the nature of the consistency argument here and suggest that it is less effective than it might at first appear to be.The Claim in the AdPeople who support both the right to abortion and… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
Steve Vladeck (now at Texas), Michael Dorf (Cornell), and Marty Lederman (Georgetown). [* * *] I've been hearing some buzz about whether House Speaker John A. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The Brosofsky/Dorf/Tribe analysis showed that this reading of “legislature” is enshrined in the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:07 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  In October 2012, I wrote complementary Verdict and Dorf on Law columns in which I explained why the Republican Party by that time had clearly revealed its sociopathic foundations.In particular, I pointed out in the Verdict column that Republicans of the day -- most definitely including that year's Republican presidential nominee, Mitt Romney -- had "openly advocated policies that harm innocent people—and they have adopted methods to achieve those ends that simply… [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
On Wednesday night, the House of Representatives passed the No Rogue Rulings Act (NORRA) of 2025 on a party-line vote: 219 in favor and 213 against. [read post]
29 May 2017, 10:25 pm
Buchanan at Dorf on Law: “Trump and the Republicans Continue Their Attacks on Education” “The release of the Trump Administration’s proposed federal budget has been met with mockery and ridicule across the political spectrum. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:30 am by Joseph Fishkin
(Michael Dorf and Neil Buchanan have been pointing all this out for some time.)Section 4 of the Fourteenth Amendment (“14.4”) says: “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law . . . shall not be questioned. [read post]