Search for: "People v. Bear" Results 1281 - 1300 of 5,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am by Stephen Halbrook
It then stated: "The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree …. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am by CMS
The first is Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd: a company dedicated to support of the rights of the Palestinian people and opposing racism. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:52 am
[The case finally showed up on Westlaw on August 8:  People v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 10:10 am by nflatow
We the people were the militia, but that militia was required to be “well regulated. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:30 am
This may confuse people in and outside of the UK. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 9:11 pm
LaFave, Search and Seizure 307, § 11.4(c) (4th ed. 2004) (quoting People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
Pursuant to Code Crim.Proc., § 280 and as held in People v Jackson, People v Krank, except where time is a material ingredient of the crime the prosecution is not confined in its evidence to the precise date laid in the indictment, but may prove that the offense was committed at any time prior to the commencement of the prosecution and such proof does not constitute a material variance. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
By the same token, the Second Amendment has no meaning if people do not have the individual right to bear arms. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:54 am by Maurizio Borghi
There are no other vehicles clearly visible and although there are some small people visible they are not prominent. [read post]