Search for: "Ray v. State"
Results 1281 - 1300
of 1,938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
The X rays revealed that the bullet was in fact lodged two and one-half to three centimeters . . . deep in muscular tissue in [his] chest, substantially deeper than had been thought when the state court granted the motion to compel surgery. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 6:09 am
And in Yu v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 10:33 am
X-Ray Imaging – X-rays provide images of your bones. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
The trial of the libel case of Rai v Bholowasia was heard by HHJ Parkes QC on 19 to 23 January 2015 and will resume on Monday 26 January 2015. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:11 am
While, perhaps, the decision is not quite as defense friendly as the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:24 am
The Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am
” Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:04 am
The justices also did not act on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm
” The Supreme Court declined to consider a case seeking to overturn the Court’s prior ruling in National Cable and Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:30 pm
” (See Ray v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:20 am
" "In Leon v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Massachusetts, 14-10078, notched its fifth relist; the case asks whether the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to bear a ray gun in self-defense. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
The opinion is long (over 9,000 words), and walks through each of Ray Dansby’s claims for relief, which are highly fact-specific. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 8:24 am
In Dauksis v. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 7:20 am
The Supreme Court upheld this practice against constitutional attack in Ray v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:48 am
As Wikipedia notes, until the “1960s, mens rea in the United States was a very slippery, vague, and confused concept” because it was based on common law. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:55 am
Reasoning that it was not fair for the homecare providers to bear the financial consequences of the state’s calculated risk in delaying implementation, the appeals court ruled that the beginning of the putative collective period is January 1, 2015 (Ray v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Horvath, Heller Ehrman LLP, New York, NY Highlights in competitor and consumer lawsuits: Axcan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 5:37 am
U.S. v. [read post]
