Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,527
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Fanworks provide incredible benefits in literacy, sexuality education, language learning, community building, and other good things that come from making something you love and sharing it with other people who might just love it too.On the content v. tech distinction that Maria Strong made: we consider ourselves content folks who use tech. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Escalate because this is a policy decision: if I am supposed to apply the policy as written then it’s easy and I delete the profile (assuming this too doesn’t require escalation; if it does I escalate for that purpose). [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 6:11 am by Eoin Daly
This was emphatically established in the early case NUR v Sullivan [1947] IR 77, where it was held that workers in a particular industry could not be forced to join only the trade union determined by a statutory tribunal. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:30 pm
 On one hand, two years ago, in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:30 am by Yvonne Daly
Although he held that no unfairness would result in the applicant’s trial for arson as a result of the garda loss of a CCTV recording, he stated that: …it is incomprehensible that every garda station does not have a [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
In 2011 and again this week, I constructed the April Fools' edition around a reworking of lyrics from Gilbert & Sullivan. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am by George M. Wallace
Sullivan at the Drug and Device Law Blog: "Any Exposure ? [read post]