Search for: "Hart v. Hart" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am by Paul T. Moura and Lorelie S. Masters
  For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:00 am by Eric Turkewitz
Exhibit A: A decision from the Second Department in December in Dockery v Sprecher, regarding a $109M medical malpractice verdict that was reduced to $9 million for a brain damaged man. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(University of Chicago)Hansen Lars (University of Chicago)Harris Milton (University of Chicago)Hart Oliver (Harvard University)Hazlett Thomas W. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 8:30 am
(8) The federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am by Paul T. Moura
  For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While our cases prohibiting viewpoint discrimination would fetter the state's power to some degree, see R.A.V. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Similarly, the estates of James Baldwin, Truman Capote, William Saroyan, Lorenz Hart, as well as children born out-of-wedlock to creators and composers like Hank Williams, have availed themselves of these valuable rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd Jassin
  Similarly, the estates of James Baldwin, Truman Capote, William Saroyan, Lorenz Hart, as well as children born out-of-wedlock to creators and composers like Hank Williams, have availed themselves of these valuable rights. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Similarly, the estates of James Baldwin, Truman Capote, William Saroyan, Lorenz Hart, as well as children born out-of-wedlock to creators and composers like Hank Williams, have availed themselves of these valuable rights. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
If you just blithely ignore it, and publish the story despite having been told that it may well be mistaken, that would be textbook "reckless disregard," which would allow liability even in a public official case: Consider, for instance, Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. [read post]