Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
While the bill’s authors may have had in mind those who first arrive in the United States on parole, however, the language of the bill is broad enough to cover those who use advance parole to leave and re-enter the United States while they have a pending application for an immigration benefit, most commonly an application for adjustment of status to that of a Lawful Permanent Resident (green card holder). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 11:24 am
Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
The statutory analysis begins with 17 U.S.C. sec. 602(a)(1): Importation into the United States, without the authority of the owner of copyright under this title, of copies or phonorecords of a work that have been acquired outside the United States is an infringement of the exclusive right to distribute copies or phonorecords under section 106, actionable under section 501. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:48 am
(So long as the contractor's infringement was "for the United States" was authorized by the US). [read post]
16 May 2010, 11:05 pm
After Kelo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
In the Jones Case (2012) (United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
”) (quot- ing United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
In other words, an identical act of infringement would yield two different damages awards simply because the infringers packaged their products in different units. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:55 pm
United States, decided today by D.C. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:38 am
EMI Entertainment World, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 9:43 am
EMI Entertainment World, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:09 am
In the United States, cross-examination is considered an important way to test the truth of a statement. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:18 pm
” Oneale v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
The coconspirators abused their position as government credit card holders by placing fraudulent orders with suppliers and all coconspirators personally benefited from the scheme by receiving kickbacks in cash and merchandise. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
The coconspirators abused their position as government credit card holders by placing fraudulent orders with suppliers and all coconspirators personally benefited from the scheme by receiving kickbacks in cash and merchandise. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 12:11 am
United States in 1925. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 12:11 am
United States in 1925. [read post]
