Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2019, 3:56 am
” He referred to the Watergate investigation of President Richard Nixon and the Whitewater investigation of President Bill Clinton. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:00 am
Qui Tam “The Bayrock Qui Tam Litigation Partnership,” Plaintiff, v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:04 am
That opinion, in turn, was probably prompted by the Watergate scandal; it was issued the day after Nixon resigned. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
Although it is essentially this balance of the Court that decided Romer and Lawrence, the two major pro-gay-rights decisions of the Court, it is also this balance of the Court that decided Boy Scouts v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:14 am
Anderson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
Nor would it be wise to give corrupt Attorneys General -- like those who served for Presidents Grant, Harding, Truman, and Nixon -- unlimited power to create Special Counsels to investigate their political enemies. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm
”Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed genuine appreciation for the draft dissent Scalia delivered to her privately, before circulating it to the conference, in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
Nixon. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 11:56 pm
The opinion in MedImmune v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:09 am
Brennan arrived after the Court’s landmark Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm
“Governmental investigation and prosecution of crimes is a quintessentially executive function,” Scalia wrote in his dissent in a 1987 Supreme Court decision, Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:03 pm
EO 11478, issued by President Nixon in 1969, bars discrimination against federal employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, and age, and was amended by President Clinton in 1998 through EO 13087 to include sexual orientation. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am
” More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 1:01 am
Nixon then astounded his friends by representing former attorney general John N. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:12 am
In one case, Riegel v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:22 pm
How well the Act’s mechanisms work is open to debate (and must be considered in the context of the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]