Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon" Results 1301 - 1320 of 1,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2019, 3:56 am by Lyle Denniston
” He referred to the Watergate investigation of President Richard Nixon and the Whitewater investigation of President Bill Clinton. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:00 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Qui Tam “The Bayrock Qui Tam Litigation Partnership,” Plaintiff, v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 5:04 am by Russ Bensing
  That opinion, in turn, was probably prompted by the Watergate scandal; it was issued the day after Nixon resigned. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
  Although it is essentially this balance of the Court that decided Romer and Lawrence, the two major pro-gay-rights decisions of the Court, it is also this balance of the Court that decided Boy Scouts v. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm by Steven Calabresi
Nor would it be wise to give corrupt Attorneys General -- like those who served for Presidents Grant, Harding, Truman, and Nixon -- unlimited power to create Special Counsels to investigate their political enemies. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm by Mark Walsh
”Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed genuine appreciation for the draft dissent Scalia delivered to her privately, before circulating it to the conference, in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:09 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Brennan arrived after the Court’s landmark Brown v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:54 pm by Scott Bomboy
“Governmental investigation and prosecution of crimes is a quintessentially executive function,” Scalia wrote in his dissent in a 1987 Supreme Court decision, Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:03 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
EO 11478, issued by President Nixon in 1969, bars discrimination against federal employees on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability, and age, and was amended by President Clinton in 1998 through EO 13087 to include sexual orientation. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 7:35 am by Erin Miller
”  More significant was his draft opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:22 pm by Guest Blogger
How well the Act’s mechanisms work is open to debate (and must be considered in the context of the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Larissa Morgan
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am by Josh Blackman
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]