Search for: "People v. Harding" Results 1301 - 1320 of 9,041
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2009, 12:15 pm
We asked the firm just what V&E would do with all these people. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 9:55 am by Venkat
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] Bose v. [read post]
Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit hears oral argument in Davis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 11:22 pm by Ilya Somin
In many cases, of course, it is very hard to prove that there was any racial motive in the first place. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
While he was initially acquitted, this was later overturned, and he was sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment and hard labour. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm by Jonathan Brun
Secondly, they said that the whole concept that Rylands is meant to protect people from hazardous neighbours is wrong, that if the legislature wants such a rule, they have to adopt it, that the only thing the Rylands rule protects people against is people doing things in the wrong places. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 7:14 am
  The CBST concert specially featured the participation of Debbie Friedman, a composer-singer whose music is probably regularly heard and loved by more people than any other contemporary composer of Jewish liturgical music. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 4:32 am by Thomas Lee and Jesse Egbert
It says that a federal judge believes that lots of people find their use of language "sensible. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am by Kali Borkoski
It’s hard for me to see how any reasonable person can answer that question in the negative. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 7:35 am
Over on the 1709 Blog, Iona Harding tackles SAS v WPL and the continuing question of whether copyright can vest in a computer language, while Simon Fogarty guests some hot and revealing news concerning New Zealand's three sheep strikes and you're out file-sharing ruling. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 12:48 pm by Stephen Griffin
  If someone wants to argue later that we don’t need Article V, so much the better! [read post]