Search for: "State v. Lively" Results 1301 - 1320 of 26,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Mallory only worked for Norfolk in Ohio and Virginia, was a Virginia resident at the time of the suit, and only briefly lived in Pennsylvania after leaving Norfolk’s employment before returning to live in Virginia. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:26 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
(1) Does a person who ceases to be entitled to UK Disability Living Allowance as a matter of UK domestic law, because she has moved to live in another member state, and who has ceased all occupational activity before such move, but remains insured against old age under the UK social security system, cease to be subject to the legislation of the UK for the purpose of art 13(2)(f) of Regulation No 1408/71? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:53 pm by Sheppard Mullin
PSKS, Inc.,[1] the United States Supreme Court decided in a 5-4 vote to overrule the long-lived rule in Dr. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 2:10 pm by Cindy Cohn
While we are disappointed that government’s stall tactics prevailed here, the case still lives on. [read post]