Search for: "State v. Urban"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 1,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 7:26 am
In McCleskey v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm
“This decision has the potential to prevent colleges and universities across the State of California from providing students with the housing they need and deserve. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
In Enriquez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 7:35 am
No one thinks that Miranda v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
As a result, on April 24, 2023, in a telephone call between Sebco and United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the latter indicted that [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:00 am
Supreme Court case, TSC Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 10:43 am
City of Madera (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 41: A CEQA document is not mandated to address urban decay merely because the project contains a retail supercenter. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 8:33 pm
Before Brown v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:32 am
For instance, in 1950, in Rex v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
” Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:29 pm
I’m also assuming, simply because they claimed it in the complaint they filed (h/t to Above the Law for this entry on the lawsuit), that the named plaintiffs in McDonald v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
The antagonisms between red states and blue cities are all the more notable because the urban areas in the crosshairs are mostly majority-minority, with many mayors and district attorneys of color. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:44 am
For support, the author of the dissent cites only his own previous speculation, see Gonzalez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Rest Easy (or Easier), Low-level Computer Technicians In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:01 am
App.2005) and Calvert v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 3:13 pm
The lessons taught by the Fifth District Court of Appeal in its recently-published decision in Protect Agricultural Land v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 8:45 am
Instead of recognizing racial integration as a compelling interest, the plurality instead issued a blow to Brown v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
As the majority states in Connecticut Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:37 am
This week, the latter strategy benefited us here at the State Bar of Arizona. [read post]
