Search for: "United States v. Choice"
Results 1301 - 1320
of 6,607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:33 pm
And there is no question that judges—especially those on the Supreme Court and the various federal appellate judges—matter in the development of law in the United States. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:11 pm
" United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 7:59 am
The Advocate General also stated that a local employment unit could be determined by member states, and would be on the facts of each case. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:17 am
Q: Are social media companies “state actors”? [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:21 pm
” In its brief on the merits, the United States starts by reiterating that, under the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:06 am
The Court does not refer to the prior United States Supreme Court decision in Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 5:06 am
United States, 318 U.S. 236, 244 (1943). [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:54 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:30 am
United States, the Supreme Court held that most if not all general authority Treasury regulations carry the force of law and, thus, are eligible for judicial review and deference under the Chevron standard. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:26 pm
In comments to the SEC, large global audit networks, including the Big Four, said that a new extraterritorial private action for cross-border securities fraud in connection with purchases and sales of securities outside the United States should not be created. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court is as poised as it has been at any time since 1973 to overturn Roe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 7:44 am
"[Defendant] argues that these sales were irrelevant because these letter agreements contractually bound [its customer] from importing these bus converters into the United States. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:45 am
Putting in your contract that United States law will apply, does not mean that the parties must bring their lawsuit in the United States. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
In Waithaka v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:49 am
s ICLQ Chinese Judgment Enforced in the United States [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 11:00 am
A esos efectos, la Ley de Relaciones Federales – que sustituyó a la ley Foraker que excluía el derecho a juicio por jurado en Puerto Rico – estableció la expresión congresional de la extensión de la doctrina de incorporación selectiva al territorio boricua: The rights, privileges, and inmunities of citizens of the United States shall be respected in Puerto Rico to the same extent as though Puerto Rico were a State of… [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:15 pm
For the first time in our nation's history, three women will be sitting together on the bench of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:57 am
United States Postal Service, 988 F. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:39 am
The contract contained a “choice of law” provision requiring the application of Saudi Arabian law even though the contract was entered into and significantly performed in the United States. [read post]
