Search for: "Ray v. State" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
World Airways, Inc., 442 F.2d 385, 389 (5th Cir. 1971) (preference of airplane passengers for female flight attendants cannot make sex into a bona fide qualification); Ray v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
World Airways, Inc., 442 F.2d 385, 389 (5th Cir. 1971) (preference of airplane passengers for female flight attendants cannot make sex into a bona fide qualification); Ray v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  © preemption is important in the 8thCir. b/c Ray v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
So your doctor (20+ years later when these diseases manifest themselves) would X-ray you and tell you what form of the disease you had. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:17 pm by crush
Phelps, the funeral-protest case, and United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
On 20 March 2015, HHJ Parkes QC (sitting in Salisbury) refused the defendant permission to appeal in the case of Rai v Bholowasia. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:47 pm by Dmitry Karshtedt
Recent state legislation related to biosimilars is an evolving, fascinating area of law—with some states affirmatively prohibiting biosimilar substitution. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
 He stated:  "The system of amending patents is an integral part of the patent system. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:32 am by John Floyd
United States: two second-degree murder convictions overturned after three days of police questioning in the absence of counsel. 1944 Ashcroft v. [read post]