Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 1321 - 1340 of 2,124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2014, 11:42 am by Epstein Becker Green
  The Court below had agreed with the State that agency fees were justified under the Court’s earlier precedents, particularly Abood v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am by Cappetta Law Offices
Elephant Rock Beach, Inc. which is currently filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am by Cappetta Law Offices
Elephant Rock Beach, Inc. which is currently filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am by Cappetta Law Offices
Elephant Rock Beach, Inc. which is currently filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:31 am by Cappetta Law Offices
Elephant Rock Beach, Inc. which is currently filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:32 am by Caroline E. Oks and Brielle A. Basso
United States, have been criticized as they deprive the producing party of its right to withhold production of privileged material. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 9:16 am
  This, of course, is one of those ridiculous legal fictions that only a court could indulge.Orin Kerr notes the decision by 10th Circuit Judge Michael McConnell in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
This paper draws a comparison between COVID claims and asbestos claims, the “Largest and Longest” wave of occupational disease claims in the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 9:00 pm by Lesley Wexler
” The United States has also defended cluster munitions on the rationale that their use could create less collateral damage than the alternative of unitary weapons and argued they might be particularly useful in dealing with adversaries who use civilian shields. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Helferich sold a license to its patents “to what, at least at one time constituted most – we may assume all – of the manufacturers of mobile handsets for sale in the United States,” according to the Federal Circuit. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:37 pm
First, the United States Supreme Court has held that even people in custody have First Amendment rights, although restrictions on those rights are scrutinized under a low standard. . . [read post]