Search for: "United States v. Clinton" Results 1321 - 1340 of 1,353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Danielle Citron
 Despite still believing Assange’s actions have been harmful, I have now come to the opposite conclusion—not for the benefit of Assange, but for the benefit of Americans and of the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 12:18 am by Orin Kerr
The lawyer for the United States is Mark Eckenwiler, DOJ’s guru on electronic surveillance. [read post]
25 May 2016, 12:44 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Department of Justice and the larger law enforcement and regulatory apparatus of the United States government. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm by Ediberto Roman
The promise of the nation’s first Black woman on the United States Supreme Court is a dramatic, historic change. [read post]
18 Sep 2005, 7:10 pm
UTR also lobbies for the following question to be posed to Judge Roberts: "How does it feel to be the fifth-hottest [male] federal judge in the United States? [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
His trial offers the possibility of fresh insights into the strange quest by some in Trump’s orbit for a kind of political kryptonite to use against Hillary Clinton – secret emails that would, they hoped, destroy her candidacy. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Is the President an 'officer of the United States' for Purposes of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment, 15 NYU Journal of Law & Liberty 1 (2021) (with Seth Barrett Tillman). [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm by Benjamin Wittes
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am by Andrew J. Grotto
One particularly high-profile case is that of Kristine Gebbie, President Clinton’s chief AIDS policy officer. [read post]
19 May 2017, 9:13 am by Helen Klein Murillo
As Quinta and I explained: Under United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
(With the exception of a mid-September media law conference in central London featuring Justice Stephen Breyer, all other events we tracked this summer took place in the United States.) [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 10:06 am
The case under discussion today has the truly odd name of USA v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am by admin
., armed with semiautomatic rifles, because their credulity outstripped the linguistic nuances of performative utterances about the Clintons. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:33 am by Richard T. Kaplar
In the United States, a handful of instances were identified involving Internet service providers (ISPs) slowing transmission speeds (“throttling”) or limiting access to competitors’ services, but those cases were resolved through existing means by the FCC or the courts. [read post]