Search for: "Works v. State" Results 1321 - 1340 of 61,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
Lord Wilson was satisfied that the appellants had shown they were relevantly different from everyone else subject to the cap for various reasons including the real difficulties faced by lone parents of children under 5 in juggling childcare with work, and the negative impact on them and their children of being subject to the cap [51]. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:33 pm by Jon Gelman
In total, “ever shift work” and “ever night work” were not associated with an elevated risk of ER-positive or -negative breast tumors. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 6:06 am by Jon Gelman
In total, “ever shift work” and “ever night work” were not associated with an elevated risk of ER-positive or -negative breast tumors. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:34 am by Jack Goldsmith
Chris Cillizza has a piece in the WP that argues that the world is too splintered and partisan and complex, and communication and persuasion too difficult, for the president of the United States to succeed. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:23 am by Thomas Baer
Illinois, which stated that indirect purchasers were unable to bring suits forward. [read post]