Search for: ""citizen's united"" Results 1341 - 1360 of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 5:59 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Senator Chuck Schumer and Representative Chris Van Hollen introduced companion bills today in the Senate and the House to restrict expenditures on certain electioneering communication and to increase reporting and disclosure requirements for others in response to the Supreme Court's... [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
I can vouch that Allison is a far better law professor than violin player.... [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 7:21 am by Edward
The Supreme Court has overturned the prohibition on corporate money in campaigns, holding that corporations have the same First Amendment rights as people do. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:27 am by Walter Olson
Early reactions to Supreme Court's blockbuster Citizens United ruling striking down ban on independent election advocacy [Point of Law, more] Vision Media Television Group continues its legal push against online critics, Section 230 or no [Consumer Law & Policy, earlier] Big FBI sting operation could leave firearms business "wounded", some say [Point of Law] Runaway's suit against McKeesport, Pa. school district dismissed on statute of limitations grounds… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:52 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"Today, I'm announcing that in my first 30 days as President, I will propose a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and give the American people--all of us--the chance to reclaim our democracy," Mrs. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:11 pm by Walter Olson
“Group Opposing Citizens United Pushes ‘Occupy the Courts’ Protest” Jan. 20 [Debra Cassens Weiss, ABA Journal] Mob rallies at Michigan governor’s private home [Meegan Holland, MLive] “Occupy” forces Gingrich to cancel event [Daily Caller] Earlier here, here, here, etc. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Jonathan Spontarelli
Campaign Finance National: “Following Citizens United, Foreign-Owned Corporations Funnel Millions into US Elections” by Karl Evers-Hillstrom and Raymod Arke for Center for Responsive Politics National: “‘No PAC Money’ Pledges Leave Corporations in a Partisan Bind” by Kate Ackley for Roll Call Ethics National: Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy, but Stops Short of Exonerating President on Obstruction by Mark Mazzetti and Katie Benner (New… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:52 am by Brian Wolfman
Congress has been discussing legislation to counter the Supreme Court's ruling last Term in the Citizens United case, which held that, under the First Amendment, corporations may independently spend whatever they'd like on campaign ads. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 1:01 am
During the State of the Union Address, President Obama criticized the Supreme Court's recent 5-4 decision in Citizen United. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 5:44 am
Cases such as Citizens United v Federal Election Comm’n (corporations can spend unlimited amounts in elections), Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:24 am by John Steele
I'm not weighing in on the president's SOTU address comments about Citizens United or about Justice Alito's response (except to say that I'm glad Alito didn't "go Nino" on the president while cameras were rolling). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:13 am by Erik Gerding
A friend of mine sent me this cartoon on Citizens United. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:41 pm by Carter Wood
Before breaking for the Memorial Day reces, Democratic leadership in the House of Representatives had hoped to push through on the final Friday H.R. 5175, the DISCLOSE Act, to limit speech in response to the Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:44 am
The case held over for reargument is Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
On the TNR blog, in an item titled "Obama's War with the Court Just Escalated," Jeff Rosen suggests that President Obama's criticism of the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision could be a sign of things to come. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:43 pm by Rick Hasen
In 2007, before Citizens United, the Supreme Court decided FEC v. [read post]