Search for: "APPLICATION OF SHARP"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,432
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm
On Wednesday 21 November 2018 the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Economou v Freitas (heard 17 and 18 April 2018). [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:34 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: New Zealand Prime Minister announces s 92A ‘three strikes’ copyright provision will be scrapped (Excess Copyright) (Michael Geist) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Public Knowledge) (Excess Copyright) (IPKat) US: TomTom files countersuit against Microsoft claiming its Streets… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:44 pm
The High Court, Mrs Justice Cox DBE, held: Following Sharp J in Potts v Densley and Pays [2011] EWHC 1144 (QB), it will make no difference to the landlord's statutory obligation to provide the prescribed information if, by the date of the hearing, the tenant's deposit has been repaid. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 10:55 am
The result would be a sharp decline in quality of care. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 9:03 pm
Both Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program require applicants to provide their citizenship or immigration status, but federal law prohibits the agencies that administer these programs from sharing an applicant’s information for any reason outside program administration. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 3:02 am
The records that private employers must keep include: Application forms submitted by applicants Records dealing with hiring, promotion, transfer, lay-off, or termination Rates of pay and compensation Tenure Selection for training or apprenticeship Additional records regarding vacation and sick time, as well as other attendance information, must be retained for three years. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 9:30 am
Security Violations by Individuals for Prohibited Items Discovered in Checked Baggage - Applicable TSA Regulation: 49 C.F.R. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:22 am
#interiordesignlaw Stay in the know Sign up and stay sharp with out interior design law updates! [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:40 pm
Governing Supreme Court authority should foreclose application of Habibi in the criminal context. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:26 am
This stands in sharp contrast to the circumstances surrounding a joint tort where the victim has no ability to define the injurious conduct upfront and where, absent joint liability, the victim would stand uncompensated as a consequence. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 3:47 pm
Just a pile of papers to shuffle around and five sharp pencils and a scratchpad to make figures on? [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 7:03 am
See Sharp v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 9:25 am
The Court further interpreted the Act to require the applicant to bear the burden to verify the truthfulness of the impugned statement, and it determined that TOC had failed to prove either that the statement was not a statement of fact or that it was true. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 2:58 am
With Webber Wentzel’s pro bono department, he acted for the defendants in the Mineral Sands case and he also acts for the amici applicants in the Karyn Maughan case. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:13 pm
This function of LSAT, however, has been put under severe stress by the sharp downturn in applicants. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 6:18 am
” The Court also cited approvingly Sharpe J. in Chadha v. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 10:30 am
Protective Order: GAO: acknowledgement of protest and protective order, Protester/Intervenor: applications for access to protected material, GAO: admission of the parties to the protective order. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 7:11 am
Tack on another $75 if submitting the application after the course. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:05 am
Pages 15-17 discusses the application of the anti-backsliding and anti-degradation provisions of the environmental rules to the proposals to increase discharges of ammonia and total suspended solids. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 12:22 pm
The majority put it this way: A host of reasons -- sharp disagreement, confusion about the issues, exhaustion after a long trial, to name but a few -- could work alone or in tandem to cause a jury to hang. [read post]
