Search for: "Billings v. Illinois"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm
The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
Facebook has settled a lawsuit over facial recognition technology, agreeing to pay $550m (£419m) over accusations it had broken an Illinois state law regulating the use of biometric details in one of the largest consumer privacy settlements in U.S. history. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
The petitioner in that case, a firearm-appreciating doctor who is among the tiny handful of people not running for president … yet, challenges a Highland Park, Illinois ordinance banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
– Marcus v. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 11:24 pm
By 2015, the law firm hired by Sterling had prepared a preliminary memorandum on potentially fraudulent billing practices. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
Beyer’s article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
Imagine little Joe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court in the landmark Alaska v John Doe case. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 8:47 am
By Konstantinos Armiros A. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
The House of Representatives has approved a bill to give 12 weeks of paid parental leave to federal workers and President Trump has shown support for the bill. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Noah Kravitz), LinkedIn (Eagle v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
Graham Smith has published his tweets about the draft bill on his cybereagle blog. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
The entire bill can be read here. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:52 am
In Illinois v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: $388 million verdict against Microsoft overturned (Ars Technica) (IP Law Observer) Briefs filed at US Supreme Court in Bilski v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 1:59 am
See Frith v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Department of Veterans Affairs (Retaliation)Cavalier v. [read post]
