Search for: "Burns v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,998
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:15 am
Dairyland Insurance contested wage loss benefits – while at the same time proving the auto accident victim was entitled… In Grays v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:44 pm
EFF and Protect Democracy filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, NetChoice v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 1:01 am
” Paul IV’s successor, Pope Pius IV, enforced the creation of other ghettos in most Italian towns, and his successor, Pope Pius V, recommended them to other bordering states. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:30 am
Faltaous v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:45 am
Burns Professor of Free and Competitive Enterprise at Columbia Business School. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 4:44 am
Vladimir V. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:13 am
See Moresi v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 5:12 am
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:29 pm
In Wilcox v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 11:56 am
‘Yegiazaryan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:56 am
While King v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
Indeed, Marcelline Burns, a primary researcher in the development of the SFSTs, has stated the initial laboratory studies have limited relevance to understanding the use and accuracy of the SFSTs twenty-five years later in field settings.4 Have the subsequent Colorado, Florida, and San Diego SFST field studies rectified the earlier problems? [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
The major doctrinal shift that would definitely change much of constitutional law is that the authors argue that the Court's holdings in The Civil Rights Cases and United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 12:16 pm
look up case number F02-2850, state of fl v. leonardo cardenas. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 3:48 am
There is bad law, terrible law, like Graham v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:31 pm
Darch Estate v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 2:24 pm
Even the flag-burning amendment people, if there still are any, probably think that case was wrongly decided too.This kind of Article V Amendment talk is easily derided as silly or “political” because none of the amendments in question is actually going to happen. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
” Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in cross-examination. [read post]
