Search for: "C. G., Matter of"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 3,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
And there is the matter that the anonymous critic was offering a criticism that was also not peer reviewed. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:35 pm
Stepparents and California Family Law: Issues and Pointers by Michael C. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
Code § 1030(g). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:10 pm
Code § 1030(g). [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Manne & Henry C. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 5:00 pm
(b) Rehabilitation Act of 1973- The amendments made by section 3 shall apply to claims of discrimination in compensation brought under sections 501 and 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791, 794), pursuant to-- (1) sections 501(g) and 504(d) of such Act (29 U.S.C. 791(g), 794(d)), respectively, which adopt the standards applied under title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 for determining whether a violation has occurred in a complaint alleging… [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:43 am
[TP(C) 877/2002)]29.10.02: In TP(C) 877/2002, the Supreme Court stayed the proceedings before the Calcutta High Court in AP No. 290/2002). [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 3:05 pm
(See Chapter VI, Section G) 8. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 8:47 am
C. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 11:01 am
”In G 1/98 [3.10] the EBA states “[t]hat A 53(b) defines the borderline between patent protection and plant variety protection. [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 5:51 am
§ § 1805(c)(1), 1824(c)(1). [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 7:40 am
The limiting feature could not be maintained in the patent in view of Article 100(c) EPC, nor could it be removed from the claims without violating Article 123(3) EPC. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 7:08 am
Since this letter was indicated as being a reply to the registrar's communication on technical matters, it was not brought to the attention of the Board. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:01 am
-c main.c gcc -I . [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 12:01 am
-c main.c gcc -I . [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 12:24 pm
Nevertheless, it tended to the view that the simulation method underlying claim 1 of each request did not contribute to the technical character of the invention and that the subject-matter of claim 1 of each request lacked inventive step.V. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
MILLER WILLIAM G. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
MILLER WILLIAM G. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 5:08 am
In a written statement on Tuesday, John Beckman, an NYU spokesman, defended the university’s handling of the matter. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
Alex, 2017 SCC 37 (36771) When ss. 258(1)(c) and 258(1)(g) are analyzed in accordance with modern principles of statutory interpretation, the Crown need not prove the demand was lawful in order to take advantage of statutory “shortcuts”; if sample taking is subjected to Charter scrutiny, and evidence of the breath test results found to be inadmissible by virtue of ss. 8 and 24(2), that ends the matter, and resort to the evidentiary shortcuts a non-issue. [read post]
