Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 41,637
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
Further, as regards the “gusset panel feature” the ED does not provide any (documentary) basis for its allegation that the skilled person would obviously provide them for obtaining a liquid-tight bottom, nor does it refute the hindsight-argument of the appellant. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 5:00 am
This blog entry was originally posted on 6/10/16. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
This blog entry was originally posted on 10/23/21. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:56 am
The frequency of such claims beg the questions (1) what exactly is a “confidential relationship,” and (2) what is the practical benefit to an objectant in establishing that one existed? [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:04 pm
Table 1: An Illustrative Risk-Informed Choice Set Option Prob Hazard Benefits Costs Net Benefits A 0.1 -$100 $10 $55 -45 B 0.3 -$80 $24 $40 -16 C 0.5 -$60 $30 $25 5 D 0.7 -$40 $28 $10 18 To see how this is so, consider a highly simplified and hypothetical choice scenario reflected in the table above. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm
10. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
Foreword, David Ibbetson (University of Cambridge, UK)Introduction, Norman Doe (Cardiff University, UK) and Stephen Coleman (Cardiff University, UK)1. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 9:36 am
To explain this with an illustration, if the amount claimed is Rs. 10 lakhs, the deposit-in-call would be 10% thereof, that is, Rs. 1 lakh. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:03 am
For example, the journal Health Affairs published a report in 2011 indicating that adverse events (medical mistakes or errors) happen in up to 1/3 of all hospital admissions, a figure 10 times greater than previous estimates. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:11 am
Relying on physical paper certificates does present practical challenges. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Litig., 1 F.4th 687, 709 n.10 (9th Cir. 2021) (discussing the impact of Lorenzo on pre-Lorenzo precedent in the Ninth Circuit); Malouf v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:48 am
One Source Sec. and Found, No. 14-07-00850, 2009 WL 7047692, at *1 (Tex. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
Here is another textbook example of a disclaimer that does not fulfil the requirements established in G 1/03.The patent proprietor filed an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the opposed patent.The Board found the (main) request I to lack novelty over document D1 (prior art under A 54(3)(4)), and auxiliary requests II and III not to comply with A 123(2). [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 5:07 pm
The claim pleaded in this case relied on harassment contrary to section 1(1) of the 1997 Protection from Harassment Act, which provides that a person must not “pursue a course of conduct (a) which amounts to harassment of another and (b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of another”. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm
June 1, 2011). [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 6:00 am
So what filings does this extension cover? [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Increasing to: $9.75 10/1/20, $10.25 10/1/21. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
Increasing to: $9.75 10/1/20, $10.25 10/1/21. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 2:59 pm
(Our take: BE is like a sieve, employees leave in droves (1 of out every 4) and the company just goes out and hires a bunch of professionals...BE must still be an attractive employers in the marketplace!) [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:26 pm
., Case 1:10-cv-00481-LMB –IDD (E.D. [read post]
