Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 13,959
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2009, 1:29 pm
On the upside -- at least for residents of San Diego -- the County of San Diego wins in the Court of Appeal, which means several more million dollars per year in taxes from the owners of the mall.So I figure all we gotta do is win another thousand or so of these cases and, poof, San Diego's budget problems will be solved. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
Butts, the “actual malice” requirement was extended to apply to “public figures” outside government, and then in 1974 case Gertz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
There are countless psycho-social studies and surveys aimed at figuring out “why” spouses engage in adulterous activity. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 1:55 pm
Matos v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
There are countless psycho-social studies and surveys aimed at figuring out “why” spouses engage in adulterous activity. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:25 pm
Meyer Intellectual Properties Limited v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
A public judgment was given at the time in anonymised form (MNB v News Group Newspapers [2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 4:52 pm
So relatively slim pickings.Still, I thought that today's (sole) opinion helped prove the point that you can sometimes figure out the way a case will come out merely by seeing the manner in which the opinion frames the facts.For example, here, the first paragraph of the opinion seemed fairly pro-plaintiff, or at least not anti-her. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:53 am
So easy that you only have to read the first sentence of the opinion to know not only the question presented, but also its unstated -- but crystal clear -- resolution by the court.So, for example, when the first paragraph of the opinion contains a single sentence, and that sentence reads: "We must decide whether evidence obtained from an authorized wiretap investigation must be suppressed where the government continued to intercept a named target's conversations despite his adoption of a… [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:51 pm
Parish, channeling Peter Kolchin, provides an economical summary: In round figures, there were two whites to every black in the antebellum South; in Russia in 1858, there was one male nobleman to every fifty-two male peasants. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
" Troester v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:51 am
The case of Kadir v Channel S Television [2014] EWHC 2305 was a hearing for assessment of damages in a libel claim following default judgment. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:10 am
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 pm
In the case of Haldimann and Others v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 8:05 am
In SEC v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 11:16 am
In Johnson, et al., v. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 4:06 am
That decision, Gandy v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 4:42 am
Citing to the New Jersey Supreme Court in the Adams v. [read post]
