Search for: "French v. State" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
--> EDITORS:Jean-Philippe Robé is a French and New York qualified partner in the Paris office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and a specialist in International Business Law. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 11:43 am
Pham, Enforcing Foreign Arbitral Awards in the United States: The Non-Arbitrable Subject Matter DefenseHenri C. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:00 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Some issues/ decisions on arbitration.Lex Arbitri Blog had brought to our attention that the French Court of Appeal had decided in Dallah Real Estate v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:28 pm by Michael W. Lewis
Does the fact that the United States has gone to great lengths to make it clear that NATO is in charge of the operation lend weight to viewing this conflict as NATO v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, 447 So.2d 1301, 1305 (Ala. 1984).AlaskaShanks v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
As of 1 January 2015, 109 Member States and one non-Member Observer State have extended a standing invitation to thematic special procedures. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 2:12 am by Andres
Just on the coattails of Roadshow Films v iiNet, we are about to get another landmark ruling on ISP liability. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am by Graham Smith
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 6:38 am by MBettman
At issue in this case is whether the Supreme Court of Ohio should update and clarify its attorney fee jurisprudence by adopting the United States Supreme Court’s guidance in Perdue v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:29 am by Ronald Mann
The treaty obligates the United States and about 160 other signatories to enforce arbitration agreements between businesses of member states. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:20 am by Eric Goldman
Oct. 21, 2020): “because the infringing act of downloading the material occurred on a computer outside the United States, there was no act in the United States to establish jurisdiction” * Donat v. [read post]