Search for: "People v Long"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 19,523
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Detective Hackney testified that he believed no warrant was necessary as long as the GPS was not hard wired, and that as long as it was placed in a public area, it was essentially just like a surveillance. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 12:57 pm
People v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:41 am
Over the following decades theSupreme Court continued to recognize the importance of the right to counsel,ultimately concluding in 1984 in Strickland v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:45 pm
McCane, 573 F.3d 1037, 1041–45 (10th Cir. 2009) (same); People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:24 am
There have also been larger observational studies, including Moderna’s ongoing observational trial, the v-safe smartphone app study, and a Harvard SPH-affiliated registry to observe pregnant people in COVID-19 trials. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 6:54 am
People v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
Hannah Lauck of the Eastern District of Virginia recently handed down the long-awaited opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 9:18 am
” Lord Sumption distinguished the facts of Mr Catt’s appeal from those in MM v United Kingdom, and the decision of the Supreme Court in R (T) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, in that: “[t]here has been no disclosure to third parties, and the prospect of future disclosure is limited by comprehensive restrictions. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm
It would be difficult for most British people to identify any right that is objectionable (unless, perhaps, they are in favour of the death penalty). [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:51 pm
In a divided opinion in People v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:09 am
--Court: Court of Appeal of Florida, Second DistrictOpinion Date: 9/10/10Cite: Atomic Tattoos, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm
And too long and complicated [36], and “unacceptable” [52]. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 1:20 pm
See also Minnesota v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 6:24 am
On Tuesday, August 6, 2019, in Palin v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Critics sometimes analogize Roe to Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 5:27 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 2:37 am
To read the entire opinion of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
