Search for: "State v. District Court of Ninth Judicial District"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2017, 8:59 am
The Court’s recent decision in CALPERS v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Earlier this spring, a Ninth Circuit en banc panel in U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:29 pm
Earlier this spring, a Ninth Circuit en banc panel in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
” Both the district court and the 9th Circuit concluded that the deputies could be held liable under the provocation doctrine. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
In the case of Pinksterboer v Coumi [2018] SADC 25, the District Court awarded compensatory damages of Aus$42,500 in respect of three publications made in the context of an “escalating neighbour dispute”. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
In a few weeks' time, Epic Games will file its opening brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, trying to turn around a litigation in which Apple undoubtedly won the first round. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:30 am
The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment enforcement. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am
Courts of Appeal for the Second, Third and Ninth Circuits. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm
District court: Permitless carry is legal in Iowa so those circumstances didn't provide reasonable suspicion for the stop and search; gun suppressed. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
State of California (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1108; see People v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Marina District Development Company, a New Jersey appellate court joins a long line of courts that simply refuse to see the illegal and harmful stereotyping embodied in sex-specific dress codes. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 11:19 am
”28 Subsequently, in McMahon v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
HarrisDocket: 10-224Issue(s): (1) Did the Ninth Circuit err in holding that a “presumption against preemption” requires a “narrow interpretation” of the Federal Meat Inspection Act's express preemption provision, in conflict with this Court's decision in Jones v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 8:45 am
As we saw with the district court’s ruling on the Florida social media censorship law in NetChoice v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:31 am
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) – On November 13, the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether the Hobbs Act (also known as the Administrative Orders Review Act) requires the district court to accept the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) interpretation of the TCPA, in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
Wal-Mart including an analysis of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am
Bar and the State Bar of New York. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
That took him outside of judicial control, which is usually not very effective anyway. [read post]
