Search for: "State v. Hadding" Results 1341 - 1360 of 124,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2010, 10:08 am by R.J. MacReady
The State charged Gonzales with two counts of aggravated sexual assault against his eight-year-old daughter. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:19 am by sally
BG v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1478 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 192 “On an appeal under section 10(1)(4) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 against the renewal of a non-derogating control order, it was not part of the court’s task to determine whether the earlier decision under section 2(1)(a) to make the original control order had been or was now flawed. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:28 pm by Staff
S. had a DUI conviction when he was in college. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 11:51 am
Very interesting opinion issued today in US V. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:02 am
On November 10, 2009, the United States Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on a case that arose from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, Kucana v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:36 am
The Baltimore City Circuit Court agreed, and dismissed.The Court issued a writ of certiorari, and on appeal McNack questioned the trial court's rulings on the due process rights under the 'state created danger' doctrine, on the lack of a "special relationship", and on dismissing the case prior to the opportunity to conduct discovery.The Court noted that Maryland had not yet, by statute or caselaw, adopted the state created danger theory to impose… [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
On one side, you had a former United States Supreme Court justice; on the other, you had a wealthy political benefactor/beneficiary — imagine if a case called Stephen Breyer v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:24 am by sally
AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 395; [2012] WLR (D) 106 “In looking to the question whether an asylum seeker, who had been a member of a terrorist organisation and convicted of a crime outside the country of refuge, fell to be excluded from the Refugee Convention pursuant to article 1F(b) and (c) thereof, one had to avoid applying a presumption of individual liability; and in asking whether the crime in question was… [read post]