Search for: "State v. Harms" Results 1341 - 1360 of 23,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2021, 4:54 am by Charles Sartain
The applicant must also provide a “no-harm” letter from the RRC stating that the injection well will not damage an existing oil or gas reservoir. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  This is one reason – in addition to leaving it to the reader to apply different weights to different harm based on, say, how much they value harms in the future to harms today -- why I don’t offer an “answer” to the trilemma for every and always. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 2:39 am by INFORRM
B:  That there is a risk that aspartame is harmful or unhealthy. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Guest post by Jake Linford, Loula Fuller and Dan Myers Professor, Florida State University College of Law, whose trademark law scholarship I have highlighted on JotwellI want to thank Lisa Ouellette for inviting me to blog about United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
These directions derived from Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and Regina v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1 and the Supreme Court and Privy Council had to decide whether the common law had taken a wrong turning in these cases. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:22 pm by Eric Goldman
Under the effects test, “the defendant allegedly must have (1) committed an intentional act, (2) expressly aimed at the forum state, (3) causing harm that the defendant knows is likely to be suffered in the forum state. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 9:21 am by Peter Margulies
Requiring further information from these established groups is likely to be duplicative, redundant, or downright harmful to refugee processing, in which the U.S. has long played a formative role. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 7:09 am by Thomas Fisher
Fisher is Solicitor General of the state of Indiana, which co-authored an amicus brief on behalf of the respondent in June Medical Services v. [read post]