Search for: "State v. London" Results 1341 - 1360 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 3:22 pm
A subsequent post will set out in more detail the impact this decision has on the state of the law. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 7:45 am
Part V: The Role of the Courts in the Application of Law: Judicial Review, Methodologies of Interpretation, and Legitimacy closes the circle by bringing the focus back to the courts and their engagement with law. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Roederer keeps its bottle while Cava loses its sparkleRoederer v J Garcia Carrion S.A. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 6:12 am by Dan Bressler
However in The Bank of London Group Limited v Simmons & Simmons LLP, the court dismissed an application for an injunction by a start-up bank stating that there was no reason to suspect a breach of confidentiality. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:03 am by Adam Chandler
(The petition, in Rosario v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
In that email, Mr Perry stated that he had received a letter purported to come from Judge Hacon himself. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 1:39 am
 * Caught in the Act: the shameful state of UK copyright legislationA respected senior member of the copyright community writes to the IPKat complaining about the inaccurate text of the CDPA posted on the IPO website. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 6:59 pm
Links to the business and human rights governance constellation Panellists include Professor Larry Catá Backer (Pennsylvania State University), Professor Dorothée Baumann-Pauly (University of Geneva), Dr David Birchall (London South Bank University), Dr Jernej Letnar Černič (Nova Univerza, Slovenia), Dr Sorcha McLeod (University of Copenhagen) and Dr Miho Taka (Coventry University). [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
  The Defendants accepted that the Claimant had a reputation in its cups but denied that the Claimant had acquired goodwill in the get-up.The Defendants' cupsThe key English cases on passing off of shape and/or get-up were considered from Reckitt & Colman v Borden (Jif Lemon) to Schweppes v Gibbens and, more recently, Numatic v Qualtex. [read post]