Search for: "The People v. English" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
However, in the English press at least, there is also a different, and indeed competing, conception of journalism, although it’s one which tends to remain implicit and which rarely sets out its stall in the public arena. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
More were able to recognize corporate v. peer source but not near 100%. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
That was certainly true of the recent Supreme Court oral argument in Counterman v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm by INFORRM
  The International Law Office has an article about strike outs in English libel proceedings, “Stricter with strike-out? [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:15 am by INFORRM
From Emmens v Pottle (1885) onwards, the English courts allowed a means by which people not really as responsible for a defamation as the writer and commercial publisher, could avoid liability. [read post]
19 Jul 2006, 8:32 am
The Green Bag Almanac includes, for instance, Walter Dellinger's amicus brief in Rumsfeld v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 1:31 pm by Marc DeGirolami
This is demonstrated, for example, by analysis of Chief Justice Vaughan's opinion in Thomas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 1:49 am
 This is because the blog has suffered a mass sign-up by people with names like xjhfds.fjkljkls and klfgflk.kgrojldf, who appear to be exercising a malign influence over the blog's group email services. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
” Doing a little research on my own, it seems to come from an English contracts case Combe v Combe [1951] 2 KB 215 dealing with promissory estoppel. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:51 am by Matt Bartus
Now let’s take a deeper dive into the issue of misclassifying people as employees vs. independent contractors. [read post]