Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 9,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2015, 10:12 pm
Another change was the introduction of a clause allowing the intelligence community to obtain an emergency exception to spy within the United States on a “non-United States person” for 72 hours—without any court order. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:00 pm
United States presenta una controversia que ha dividido las cortes inferiores: “¿Qué es una “amenaza real”? [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 11:34 pm
United States presenta una controversia que ha dividido las cortes inferiores: “¿Qué es una “amenaza real”? [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
" Whether the speaker's state of mind determines whether speech is a true threat is a unresolved legal question. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:40 am
It is also true that the real issue at stake in this case is the substantive law underlying the jurisdictional element: whether the parent company can claim in its own name for the damage caused to its subsidiaries on the basis of the principle of economic unit. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
We've been tracking the status of Lopez Torres v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:55 am
The recent case of United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 6:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:43 pm
Rich Kopf United States District Judge [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
`District courts are required to conduct evidentiary hearings only when a substantial claim is presented and there are disputed issues of material fact that will affect the outcome of the motion.' United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
In the 1832 case Worchester v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
V. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 1:59 pm
United States (2012) and Hines v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:54 am
" In practice, it's hard to find cases where such a standard would likely change the outcome; but Thursday's Washington Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 3:17 pm
State v. [read post]
