Search for: "United States v. District Court" Results 1341 - 1360 of 34,571
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2007, 10:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holds that federal district courts may only prohibit attorney speech that is substantially likely to materially prejudice ongoing criminal proceedings: A three-judge Third Circuit panel has today issued its much anticipated decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 11:17 am by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
The United States District Court for the District of Maryland recently issued a Memorandum Opinion in Vance v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 8:23 am by editor@howarddc.com
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm by PaulKostro
FONOCK; UPPER MERION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT; UPPER MERION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS; UPPER MERION TOWNSHIP, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, No. 10-4110, May 24, 2011: “[O]ne of the essential qualities of a Court of Justice [is] that its proceedings should be public. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:00 am by Ernest E. Badway
In an interesting procedural decision, the United States District for the Southern District of New York certified an interlocutory appeal regarding the 2008 Housing and Economic Recovery Act (“HERA”), as to if the new statute displaced the statute of repose, generally, governing claims pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 9:05 am
United States [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a district court may enter a restitution order beyond the time limit prescribed in 18 USC § 3664(d)(5) [text] if the sentencing court made clear prior to the deadline that restitution would be ordered. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:39 pm by Frank A. Bruno
In a recent order, a judge in the United States District Court for the Central District of California held that the defendants were misjoined because even though “some of the products incorporate the same wireless technology [it] does not alter the fact that Plaintiff brings suit against unrelated defendants for independent acts of infringement. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:16 am
Appellant was returned to the United States in custody and, although previously had been voluntarily in the United States, he was not "found in" the US at that point. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:18 pm
  The Eastern District Court stated that Third Circuit precedent to the contrary was no longer valid since the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Bauman. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 1:58 pm by Autumn Callan
United States [opinion, PDF], Turner and several other defendants moved to have their sentences vacated on the assertion that the government violated the rule of law from Brady v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 2:28 pm
The United States District Court judge may have rendered a written decision. [read post]