Search for: "People v Johns" Results 1361 - 1380 of 8,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm by Brian Shiffrin
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Adam Wagner
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:18 am by Rodger Citron
”  Congress and the President—who are directly elected by the people—develop policy. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 12:22 pm by Unknown
Batok in the east, aloha in the west: intellectual property protections of Indigenous Peoples in the Philippines and the United States. [read post]
15 May 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ilya Shapiro, Ilya Somin on Supreme Court case of Murr v. [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
  Similarly, people with whom it was said he had helped to attack others, and people referred to as “victims of Rudd” were his personal data. [read post]