Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF D B"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 10,343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2013, 9:48 am
Gronewoller (In Re Mascio), 454 B.R. 146 (D. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 3:40 am
Most people are not aware that there are different types of custody in New York State. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:11 am
If there are caps and other restrictions in place in that particular state, the state is more likely to get an A or a B. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 4:56 am
The [process of] liberation is by Allah’s grace still ongoing in the al-Ghâb Plains. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 3:29 pm
State (Ind. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 10:44 pm
§ 271, including individual sections discussing § 271(a), (b), (c), (d) and (f). [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:43 pm
Courts have an impulse that there’s something to protect and that the D has done something similar. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
§1332(d)(3), that the court should base its decision on the “totality of the circumstances” and the “interests of justice. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 4:13 pm
B. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:50 am
By: John B. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:51 am
If we really want unitary rights, there has to be more attention to the state/federal relationship. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 7:37 am
[REPEALED] * * * (d) Serving by Electronic Means. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 7:49 am
I'd suggest both, in that order. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:14 pm
A couple of groups have already tentatively expressed an interest, but we’d be happy to see more. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:55 am
Written by: Jay B. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:29 am
Background In case T-757/22, Puma filed an application for a declaration of invalidity against RCD no. 004160273-0015 for ‘footwear’ with the following views: Case T-758/22 concerned an invalidity application of Puma against RCD no. 008367742-0013 for ‘footwear’ with the following views: Puma based the applications on a lack of individual character (Art. 25(1)(b), Art. 6 Community Design Regulation, ‘CDR’) because of the following earlier designs: … [read post]
27 May 2020, 6:53 am
(b) Issues: (1) Could the parties raise a limitations defense to the notice of deficiency? [read post]
14 Oct 2006, 9:37 am
(2) Any security issued or guaranteed by the United States or any territory thereof, or by the District of Columbia, or by any State of the United States, or by any political subdivision of a State or territory, or by any public instrumentality of one or more States or territories, or by any person controlled or supervised by and acting as an instrumentality of the Government of the United States pursuant to authority granted by the… [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 11:55 pm
(1) Every subpoena shall: (A) state the name of the court from which it is issued; (B) state the title of the action, the name of the court in which it is pending, and its case number; (C) command each person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony or to produce and permit inspection and copying of designated books, documents or tangible things in the possession, custody or… [read post]
