Search for: "State v. Harms"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 23,508
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2018, 1:21 am
For the majority, Lord Kerr made clear that there was a duty on the police to investigate allegations of ill-treatment regardless as to whether state agents were responsible for the infliction of the harm – and that this was an operational duty [20]. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:40 pm
Philip Morris U.S.A. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:44 am
Additional Resources:Estate of Gagnon v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
The “state secrets” cases are General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:25 am
” Khoury v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In its 6-3 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:52 pm
See Doe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
Butler v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
–State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 10:29 am
In CIGNA v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:34 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:15 pm
Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Health Care) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html State of Alaska v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In Ferguson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:15 pm
While negligence law generally serves to hold those who owe and breach a duty of care to others responsible for any resulting harm proximately caused by the breached duty, this is not always so for governmental entities such as cities, towns, and states. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 5:57 am
From Doe 107 v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:50 am
A cybersurveillance nonintrusion test implicitly suggested by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 7:50 am
A cybersurveillance nonintrusion test implicitly suggested by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
